Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Burdock et al v. Twila et al
as 2:2026cv02934
Plaintiff:
Kamesha Burdock, Stephanie McDaniel and Russell McDaniel
Defendant:
Twila, Trevis Matthews, elmer macklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macklin v. Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv08817
Plaintiff:
Felicia Macklin
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC, House of Cheatham LLC, L'Oreal USA, Inc. and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Macklin v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 2:2026cv02696
Plaintiff:
Vincent Macklin
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Walgreens Holding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Macklin v. People of the State of California
as 26-3561
Petitioner:
EDWARD MACKLIN
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Green v. Flemings et al
as 2:2026cv02575
Plaintiff:
Jessica Elaine Green
Defendant:
FNU Flemings, Dr. FNU Williams, Captain FNU Cato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Macklin v. People of the State of California
as 26-3105
Petitioner:
EDWARD MACKLIN
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Macklin (PS) v. Aurora Detention Center et al
as 1:2026cv01224
Plaintiff:
Jerome Dwayne Macklin
Defendant:
Aurora Detention Center, Arapahoe County Detention Center and Denver Detention City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Proby v. Williams et al
as 1:2026cv00029
Plaintiff:
Austin Tyriek Proby
Defendant:
Unknown Williams, Jeremy Macklin and City of Hayti, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward Macklin v. People of the State of California
as 2:2026cv01766
Plaintiff:
Edward Macklin
Defendant:
Sydney Bennett, Alexandra Marley, Diane Dills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macklin v. People of the State of California
as 26-533
Petitioner:
EDWARD MACKLIN
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
