Cases 1 - 10 of 100
PORTER v HUNTER SARVER et al
as 2:2026cv01541
Plaintiff:
DAJUNT PORTER
Defendant:
SGT HUNTER SARVER, SGT ANDRESIK, SGT JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaver v. Steve Madden, Ltd.
as 2:2026cv07782
Plaintiff:
Katherine Beaver
Defendant:
Steve Madden, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Madden v. United States Center for SafeSport, Inc.
as 1:2026cv03027
Plaintiff:
Frank Madden
Defendant:
United States Center for SafeSport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAIR-FOUNDATION INC et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2026cv00315
Plaintiff:
CAIR-FOUNDATION INC and CAIR-FLORIDA INC
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, JAMES UTHMEIER, BLAISE INGOGLIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dressel v. Monsanto Company, et al.
as 26-3899
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP DRESSEL
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, M&G ENTERPRISES OF VOLUSIA, INC. and others
Otis Worldwide Corporation v. Madden
as 3:2026cv00952
Plaintiff:
Otis Worldwide Corporation
Defendant:
Cory Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hampton v. Payne et al
as 4:2026cv00589
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Hampton
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jared Byers, Carl Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wrobel v. Steve Madden, Ltd.
as 1:2026cv24017
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Wrobel
Defendant:
Steve Madden, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Madden v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv05510
Plaintiff:
Alison Mary Madden
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. D'Agostino
as 26-1404
Defendant:
STEVEN G. JAMES, MAE A. D'AGOSTINO, JOSEPH F. BIANCO and others
Plaintiff:
ETHAN DAVIS SMITH, - and JENNIFER L. DEES, -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
