Cases 21 - 30 of 429
Malone v. Zarate et al
as 4:2023cv02652
Plaintiff:
Deshawn P. Malone
Defendant:
A. Zarate, J. Larraux and D. Vaca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malone v. King County Jail
as 2:2023cv00818
Plaintiff:
Winter Lavon Malone
Defendant:
King County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05462
Plaintiff:
David Malone
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Eric Malone v. Palm Springs Police Department
as 23-55446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC RAY MALONE
Defendant / Appellee:
PALM SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Eric Ray Malone v. State of Montana
as 2:2023cv03833
Plaintiff:
Eric Ray Malone
Defendant:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Malone v. King County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Winter Lavon Malone
Defendant:
King County Jail and Webber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Ray Malone v. Tonys Automotive Center
as 5:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Eric Ray Malone
Defendant:
Tonys Automotive Center, CA Department of Motor Vehicles, AAA of Southern CA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eric Ray Malone v. Palm Springs Police Department
as 5:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Eric Ray Malone
Defendant:
Palm Springs Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Eric Ray Malone v. Bank of The West et al
as 5:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Eric Ray Malone
Defendant:
Bank of The West and Karen Carner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
