Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disability (Public Accommodations)
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-2163
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY LOHMAN and LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY LOHMAN, A Professional Corporation
Defendant:
JEREMY BRANCH, CHAMPION MARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a CMS, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-2109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY LOHMAN, JEREMY BRANCH, CHAMPION MARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a CMS and others
Defendant:
DAVID MIZE, IBRAHIM MUHTASEB, ALYSON DYKES and others
SATTERFIELD v. LT. MANNY GUILL
as 1:2023cv00351
Defendant:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD and LT. MANNY GUILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Barry Alexander
as 22-7388
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY JAMEL ALEXANDER, a/k/a Manny
Cooke v. CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation et al
as 1:2021cv01401
Defendant:
Ryan Denise Estes, Cathy Korell, CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Kent Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
US v. Armstead Craig
as 21-4534
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARMISTEAD CRAIG, a/k/a Manny, a/k/a Manny Moo, a/k/a Armstead William Craig
Hunter v. Virginia's Dept. of Corr. et al
as 7:2021cv00497
Plaintiff:
Burnard Hunter
Defendant:
Virginia's Dept. of Corr., Davis and Mannis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Manny Lizardo
as 21-6506
Defendant / Appellant:
MANNY LIZARDO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
