Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DAVILA MALAVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43594
Plaintiff:
FELIX MANUEL DAVILA MALAVE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrasquillo v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00815
Defendant:
Checkr, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carlos Manuel Davila Carrasquillo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc v. Davila-Ortiz et al
as 3:2016cv01378
Plaintiff:
DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc
Defendant:
Manuel Davila-Ortiz, Gladys Esther Hamilton-Morales and Conjugal Partnership Davila-Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
ERROR-NOT USED
as 3:2016cv01374
Plaintiff:
DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc
Defendant:
Manuel Davila Ortiz, Gladys Esther Hamilton-Morales and Conjugal Partnership Davila Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Manuel Davila v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-41321
Petitioner - Appellant:
MANUEL DAVILA
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Davila v. Stephens
as 3:2014cv00299
Petitioner:
Manuel Davila
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davila-Martinez v. USA
as 2:2013cv00320
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Davila-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davila v. CitiMortgage Inc
as 3:2012cv04704
Plaintiff:
Manuel Davila
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Davila et al
as 2:2012cv02777
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Javier Davila and Jose Manuel Davila
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Davila et al
as 2:2012at01478
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Javier Davila and Jose Manuel Davila
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
