Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Jose FigueroaIn re: Jose Figueroa
as 23-12595
Petitioner:
In re: JOSE MANUEL FIGUEROA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Spencer et al v. Figueroa et al
as 1:2023cv04700
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Spencer, Amaria Spencer and Anjeleah Tellis
Defendant:
Manuel Figueroa, Mario Tapia, Marcy Gougis-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Figueroa Ramos v. Kijakaz
as 3:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Luis M Figueroa-Ramos and Luis Manuel Figueroa Ramos
Defendant:
Kilolol Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakaz
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
FIGUEROA-RIVERA v. JONES
as 5:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
ERIC MANUEL FIGUEROA-RIVERA
Defendant:
D JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Figueroa v. USA
as 23-11710
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL FIGUEROA
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Elmer Figueroa-Garcia, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1249
Petitioner:
ELMER MANUEL FIGUEROA-GARCIA and EDYN JEOVANNY GARCIA-FIGUEROA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jose Figueroa
as 23-10316
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL FIGUEROA
Figueroa-Adorno v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL FIGUEROA-ADORNO
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Murphy v. Triple-S Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10259
Plaintiff:
John Murphy
Defendant:
Triple-S Management Corporation, Roberto Garcia-Rodriguez, Luis A. Clavell-Rodriguez and others
CICCOTELLI v. TRIPLE-S MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05221
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
TRIPLE-S MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, LUIS A CLAVELL RODRIGUEZ, CARI M DOMINGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
