Cases 1 - 10 of 1,134
Niemi-Yogoub v. Rowndy's Illinois, LLC
as 1:2024cv03817
Plaintiff:
Gina Niemi-Yogoub
Defendant:
Roundy's Illinois, LLC doing business as Mariano's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hemminger v. Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Hemminger, Jr
Defendant:
Paul Nelson, Paulette Storie, Sherry Kness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03501
Plaintiff:
Kiana Burgess
Defendant:
City of New York, Officer Alen Mariano, Officer Chaim Winderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D. Diaz v. Paul Camacho et al
as 2:2024cv03737
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
PAUL CAMACHO, N. CALVILLO, G. PRECIADO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Marano Company et al v. Dom's Market, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03472
Plaintiff:
Anthony Marano Company and Market Cuts, LLC
Defendant:
Dom's Market, LLC doing business as Dom's Kitchen & Market, Dom's Market Holdco, Inc., Foxtrot Retail, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Soto De Leon et al v. King Pho Chicago, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03261
Plaintiff:
Mariano Antonio Soto De Leon and Adem Alkan
Defendant:
King Pho Chicago, LLC and Hoang Viet Nguyen
Alticor Inc. et al v. Bryner et al
as 1:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Alticor Inc. and Amway Corp.
Defendant:
Fernando Gabriel Bryner, Maria Ines Martinetti, Stephanie Bryner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Sanchez-Jimenez v. US, et al
as 24-1364
Plaintiff:
JOSE AMAURY SANCHEZ-JIMENEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and MARIANO GARAY-ORTIZ
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Meza
as 24-1784
Defendant:
MARIANO MEZA and Durango
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
