Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PITTS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv12042
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
MARY PITTS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PITTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv95647
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MADISON RENAE MARIE PITTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAFFE v. PITT et al
as 3:2015cv05794
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JAFFE
Defendant:
JOEL PITT, MARIE PITT and JIM WINDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pitts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv12204
Plaintiff:
Patricia Mary Pitts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Pitts v. Logan's Roadhouse, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00448
Defendant:
Logan's Roadhouse of Texas, Inc. and Logan's Roadhouse, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Claudia Marie Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Pitts v. Union Security insurance Company
as 4:2010cv00102
Plaintiff:
Mary Pitts
Defendant:
Union Security insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Progressive Classic Insurance Company v. Pitts et al
as 2:2009cv01094
Plaintiff:
Progressive Classic Insurance Company and Progressive Classic Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jared Pitts and Mary Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Guynup v. Stribling et al
as 1:2007cv00845
Plaintiff:
Traci Mikell Guynup
Defendant:
Robert M. Stribling, Jr., Stribling Orchard, Charlie Ray Fox, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Guynup et al
as 1:2007cv01051
Plaintiff:
Traci Mikell Guynup
Defendant:
Robert M. Stribling, Jr., Stribling Orchard, Charlie Ray Fox, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
