Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Dwayne Gray v. Gary Miller
as 24-1504
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. GRAY
Defendant:
GARY MILLER, Judge, Marion County Superior Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
HAIRSTON v. MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT #32 -- CLERK(S) OF THE MARION CIRCUIT COURT et al
as 1:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
JOHN MANUEL HAIRSTON
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT #32 -- CLERK(S) OF THE MARION CIRCUIT COURT, INDIANA SUPREME COURT, DOXPOP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamari Douthit v. Marion County Superior Court
as 20-2164
Petitioner:
JAMARI R. DOUTHIT
Respondent:
MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Wendell Brown v. Marion County Superior Court, et al
as 19-2799
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER SMITH, in official and private capacities, MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, MAJOR DAVIS, in official and private capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDELL BROWN, also known as Menes Ankh El
Tessema Osaze-Bey v. Marion County Superior Court
as 19-1749
Petitioner:
TESSEMA OSAZE-BEY
Respondent:
MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
ANKH-EL v. MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2019cv00134
Defendant:
DAVIS, GIBSON, R. ALLEGA and others
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. HAGENMAIER et al
as 1:2018cv03654
Defendant:
MATT ANGLEMEYER, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, SHANNON LOGSDON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANKH-EL v. MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2018cv03453
Defendant:
KIETH BUTTS, R. ALLEGA, PIERCE and others
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
