Cases 1 - 6 of 6
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
as 1:2019mc00145
Defendant:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS, PAUL LAIRD, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ALFRED BOURGEOIS, JULIUS ROBINSON, JAMES H. ROANE, JR., and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BRUCE WEBSTER, ANTHONY BATTLE and ORLANDO HALL
Intervenor Defendant:
RICHARD VEACH
Intervenor:
JEFFREY PAUL
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
James Roane, et al v. Karen Tandy, et al
as 12-5020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
James H. Roane, Richard Tipton and Cory Johnson
Movant - Appellant:
Jeffrey Paul
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bruce Webster, Anthony Battle and Orlando Hall
Defendant - Appellee:
Karen P. Tandy, Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration, Harley G. Lappin, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Newton E. Kendig, II, Medical Director, Health Services Division, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Veach, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary Terre Haute
Torrefranca v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv01527
Plaintiff:
Delmo Figura Torrefranca
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Dora B Schriro, GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
METCALF v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD METCALF
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, MICHAEL ATWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monier v. Bezy et al
as 4:2007cv00466
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Felipe Monier
Defendant:
Mark Bezy, Harrell Watts, T.R. Sniezak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
METCALF v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv00206
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD METCALF
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, MICHAEL ATWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
