Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kenneth Fitch v. State of Maryland
as 23-2135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH FITCH, PHYLIS REINARD, DEBORAH HEIM and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE BRIDGETT, DEBORAH MONROE, DEBORAH GARLITZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, HELEN T. GRADY, Secretary of Budget and Management and WES MOORE, Governor of Maryland
Defendant:
SRPS BOARD OF TRUSTEES PENSION SYSTEM, c/o Office of Attorney General, DERECK E. DAVIS, State Treasurer and BROOKE E. LIERMAN, State Comptroller
AFSCME Maryland Council 3 v. State of Maryland
as 22-1362
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE BRIDGETT, KENNETH FITCH, PHYLIS REINARD and others
Appellant:
AFSCME MARYLAND COUNCIL 3
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN, SECRETARY DAVID R. BRINKLEY and others
Michael Bridgett v. State of Maryland
as 22-1078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BRIDGETT and MICHAEL WAYNE BRIDGETT
Plaintiff:
KENNETH FITCH, PHYLIS REINARD, DEBORAH HEIM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN, SECRETARY DAVID R. BRINKLEY and others
US v. Arnold Henry
as 19-7218
Defendant / Appellant:
ARNOLD MARK HENRY, a/k/a B
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Arnold Mark Henry
as 17-7012
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARNOLD MARK HENRY, a/k/a B
Henry v. USA
as 2:2014cv00302
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Arnold Mark Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Henry et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv11763
Plaintiff:
Kelly Henry and Mark Henry
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv32376
Plaintiff:
Janice Pierson , Janet Plasse , Karen Coleman and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv00047
Defendant:
Arnold Mark Henry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
