Cases 1 - 9 of 9
US v. Moffett
as 22-1075
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK MOFFETT, a/k/a Mark Thomas Moffett
Plaza Home Mtge v. Innovated Holdings
as 21-60412
Defendant / Appellant:
Kirk Gibbs, Rance Magee, Ronnie Kahapea and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaza Home Mortgage, Incorporated
Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Innovated Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00038
Defendant:
Innovated Holdings, Inc. doing business as SITCOMM Arbitration Association, Rance Magee, Ronnie Kahapea and others
Plaintiff:
Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC v. SITCOMM Arbitration Association et al
as 2:2019cv00193
Plaintiff:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Defendant:
Mark Johnson, SITCOMM Arbitration Association, Ronnie Kahapea and others
Interested Party:
Eeon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Imperial Industrial Supply Company et al v. Thomas et al
as 2:2019cv00129
Defendant:
SITCOMM Abitration Association, Quintina Marie Thomas, Sandra Goulette and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Raskin, Imperial Industrial Supply Company, Anthony Bustos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moffett v. Colvin
as 14-3075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK MOFFETT
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security
BRANDENBERG et al v. PEARSON EDUCATION, INC.
as 2:2013cv03319
Plaintiff:
JIM BRANDENBERG , TIM FITZHARRIS and MARK MOFFETT
Defendant:
PEARSON EDUCATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Moffett v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2012cv01443
Plaintiff:
Mark Moffett
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Ressmeyer et al v. Getty Images, Inc.
as 1:2008cv04360
Plaintiff:
Roger Ressmeyer, Richard Minden, Charles Krebs and others
Defendant:
Getty Images, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
