Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Wlodarczyk et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv06010
Plaintiff:
James Yensel, David Wood, Daniel Wlodarczyk and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Mark Woods v. Shawn Wills, et al
as 24-1928
Defendant:
P/O CREMEN, #9052 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O LT. HOYT, #225 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER SHAWN WILLS, #3680 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
MARK WOODS
WOODS v. WARDEN USP CANAAN
as 2:2024cv01833
Petitioner:
MARK WOODS
Respondent:
WARDEN USP CANAAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Velez (Nelson)
as 24-1468
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER NELSON, CARMELO VELEZ, CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WOODS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
MARK WOODS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Velez (Garcia)
as 24-923
Defendant:
JONATHAN GARCIA, CARMELO VELEZ, CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dunn v. F B I et al
as 1:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Catherine Chase Nugent Dunn
Defendant:
F B I, Sheriffs Office Rapides Parish, City of New Orleans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander et al v. Wood et al
as 1:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Laneesha Alexander and Rebecca Nichols
Defendant:
Mark Wood and Rodney Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Damond v. Alexandria et al
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Alexandria, Mark Wood, Colin Radar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
