Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Lawton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Marqus A. Lawton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HARDEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
MARQUE JACQUES HARDEN
Defendant:
Middle District Court and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Marques Rodriguez v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv22170
Plaintiff:
Mariela Marques Rodriguez
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00513
Plaintiff:
Marques Dwayne Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Qualls v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01331
Plaintiff:
Andrea Marque Qualls
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2018cv00191
Plaintiff:
Marques Dwayne Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MARQUES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2016cv04961
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO J. MARQUES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Reed v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Marques Reed
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hebert v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv30198
Plaintiff:
Marques Isiaha Hebert
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Pacheco Marques v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00468
Plaintiff:
Carlos Pacheco Marques
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
