Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Johnson v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02088
Petitioner:
Marty Johnson
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Murphy v. Aramark Food Service and Facilities Management, East Carolina University et al
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Larry F. Murphy
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Facilities Management, East Carolina University, ARAMARK Campus, LLC, Kelvin Tarakwasha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Roberson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02164
Petitioner:
Marty Bryan Roberson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Corriher v. Richland Diversified Industries, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Theodore H. Corriher
Defendant:
Richland Diversified Industries, Inc., All Family Craft, Inc., Charger Deck Boat, Inc. and others
STRATTON v. CITY OF KANNAPOLIS et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
KATHY STRATTON
Defendant:
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS, J. M. LIVENGOOD, M. T. HOEHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaston v. State of NC
as 3:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
Marty Tarell Gaston
Respondent:
State of NC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCLAIN v. CAUSEY et al
as 1:2020cv00695
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, JOHN MICHAEL CAUSEY, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE and others
Plaintiff:
DALLAS R. MCCLAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ZOU et al v. MARKET AMERICA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00954
Defendant:
DOLLY KUO, MARKET AMERICA WORLDWIDE INC., LIU LUCY HONG and others
Plaintiff:
OLLIE LAN, JINHUA ZOU, CHUANJIE YANG and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
