Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Santiago v. AK Security Services LLC
as 1:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
Martin Santiago
Defendant:
AK Security Services LLC
USA v. David Santiago
as 20-13671
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID MARTIN SANTIAGO, a.k.a. Blink
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Santiago-Robles v. USA
as 8:2017cv00226
Petitioner:
Martin Santiago-Robles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Roach v. City of Miami Gardens et al
as 1:2016cv24229
Plaintiff:
Carey Roach
Defendant:
City of Miami Gardens , Eddo Trimino and MARTIN SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santiago v. Belgo Waffle Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02939
Defendant:
Belgo PPR LLC, Belgo Waffle Inc. and Thomas Degeest
Plaintiff:
Martin Santiago
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Policarpo Santiago-Reye
as 14-40708
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
POLICARPO MARTIN SANTIAGO-REYES, also known as Policzpo Santiago
CERVANTES v. SANTIAGO et al
as 2:2014cv00978
Plaintiff:
HUMBERTO CERVANTES
Defendant:
ELIZABETH SANTIAGO, ELDA SANTIAGO and PEDRO MARTIN SANTIAGO CLAVEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPSON et al v. CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS et al
as 1:2013cv24312
Plaintiff:
EARL SAMPSON , TOREE M DANIELS , ANTHONY LOWERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS , OLIVER G GILBERT, III , SHIRLEY GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. David Santiago
as 11-15249
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID MARTIN SANTIAGO
Santiago v. Dollar One, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00045
Counter Claimant:
Dollar One, Inc. and Basit H. Motiwala
Defendant:
Dollar One, Inc. and Basit H. Motiwala
Counter Defendant:
Martin Santiago
Plaintiff:
Martin Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
