Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BETANCOURTH v. LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER BETANCOURTH
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL, JANINE DONATE, MARK JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sable v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00849
Plaintiff:
Georgine Marie Sable
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Momo v. Sable et al
as 3:2015cv01665
Plaintiff:
Joseph Momo
Defendant:
Mary Sable, Izzirrary, John Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mary Sable, et al v. Jennifer Velez, et al
as 10-4647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY SABLE and MICHAEL LANZA
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER VELEZ, Esq., Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Human Services and JOHN GUHL, Director, New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services
Toritto v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00276
Plaintiff:
Joseph Toritto
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Commonwealth of PA, PA State Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mary Sable, et al v. Jennifer Velez, et al
as 10-1148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY SABLE and MICHAEL LANZA
Plaintiff - Non-Participating:
WILLIAM GERWECK
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER VELEZ, Esq., Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Human Services and JOHN GUHL, Director, New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services
Guerrero v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv02544
Plaintiff:
Bienvenido Agapito Guerrero
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Attorney General of PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SABLE et al v. VELEZ et al
as 3:2009cv02813
Plaintiff:
MARY SABLE, MICHAEL LANZA, KATHERINE D. FERRERI and others
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ and JOHN R. GUHL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
