Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Taylor v. Rent-A-Center West, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv02681
Plaintiff:
Natasha Kayla Marie Taylor
Defendant:
Rent-A-Center West, Inc. doing business as Home Choice and Get It Now, LLC doing business as Home Choice
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
DeAndre Dunston v. Mary Taylor
as 21-7531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEANDRE DUNSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE MARY TAYLOR, Individual capacity, NURSE WALL, Individual and HSA A. BOYD, Individual capacity
Defendant:
COLONEL CRAIG, Individual capacity, SUPERINTENDENT CARMEN I. DESADIER, Individual capacity, SUPERINTENDENT LARRY LEABOUGH, Individual capacity and others
PELTIER et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 1:2020cv03775
Plaintiff:
Leslie Wilkie Peltier, ANDREW L. LAVERDURE, LEONA KIENENBERGER and others
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT and STEVEN MNUCHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
USA v. Walker et al
as 1:2018mj00738
Defendant:
Orenthial Walker and Teiana Marie Taylor
Plaintiff:
USA
Taylor et al v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. et al
as DE/1:16-cv-01295
Plaintiff:
Mary Taylor and Gerald Taylor
Defendant:
Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Hospira Worldwide, Inc. and others
Karbash v. Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07973
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Karbash
Defendant:
Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Robert Flanagan, Allan Oberman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Pearson v. Bank of America et al
as 7:2016cv01921
Plaintiff:
Warren Lemont Pearson
Defendant:
Bank of America, Mary Taylor, Jennifer Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
In re: Linda Taylor
as 16-13430
Petitioner:
In re: LINDA MARIE TAYLOR
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hunter v. Taylor et al
as 2:2014cv01916
Plaintiff:
Chase Carmen Hunter
Defendant:
Mary Taylor, Ohio Department of Insurance, The National Association of Insurance Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
