Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Clifton v. Rural King Holdings, LLP
as 4:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
Matthew Clifton
Defendant:
Rural King Holdings, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CLIFTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28828
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JERED MATTHEW CLIFTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv00752
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DAN CALDWELL, CHRIS BRUYN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SARHAN and BARBARA STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MCCLINTOCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv71619
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CLIFTON MCCLINTOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerome et al v. Grill Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv20024
Plaintiff:
Todd Jerome , Malik White , Jennifer Gilner and others
Defendant:
Grill Concepts, Inc. , Grill Concepts Services, Inc.. , Robert Spivak and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
USA v. Gremillion
as 1:2014cv01797
Defendant:
Matthew Clifton Gremillion
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gregory Grosholz v. Scott Mason
as 12-8120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SCOTT GROSHOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT MASON, MATTHEW CLIFTON and SHARON HINTON
Defendant:
OLA LEWIS, LEE BOLLINGER, WILLIAM THOMAS PEREGOY and others
Grosholz v. Lewis et al
as 5:2011ct03119
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Grosholz
Defendant:
Ola M. Lewis, Lee Bollinger, William T. Peregoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLIFTON v. FLORIDA BOW THRUSTERS INC
as 6:2010cv00416
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CLIFTON
Defendant:
FLORIDA BOW THRUSTERS INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
CLIFTON v. FLORIDA BOW THRUSTERS INC
as 5:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CLIFTON
Defendant:
FLORIDA BOW THRUSTERS INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
