Cases 21 - 30 of 126
Sevegny v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2019cv00498
Defendant:
Particia Coyne-Fague, Maurice Lanciaux, L.T. Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Sevegny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Progressive Insurance Co.
as 19-1520
Defendant / Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICE D. YOUNG, and on behalf of minor child T.A. YOUNG and MAURICE D. YOUNG, and on behalf of minor child T.A.Y.
Sinkfield v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2019cv10776
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Devens, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Maurice Sinkfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01123
Defendant:
Getinge AB, Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Maurice Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. STATE OF MAINE
as 2:2018cv00475
Respondent:
STATE OF MAINE
Petitioner:
MAURICE YOUNG
Undetermined:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
YOUNG v. PROGRESSIVE INS CO
as 1:2018cv00197
Plaintiff:
MAURICE D YOUNG
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INS CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vigneau v. Pedersen et al
as 1:2018cv00392
Defendant:
Daniel C. Austin, John Eric Bell, Alissa Berrymann and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Vigneau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2018cv10642
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Smith
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sinkfield v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2018cv10223
Plaintiff:
Maurice Sinkfield
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
