Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Davis v. California Medical Facility We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01696
Plaintiff: Maurice Davis, Jr.
Defendant: California Medical Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Fox
as 1:2007cv00570
Petitioner: Richard Maurice Davis
Respondent: John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03650
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Davis v. Veal
as 2:2007at00672
Defendant: M. Veal
Plaintiff: Maurice Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Veal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01477
Defendant: M. Veal
Plaintiff: Maurice Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Veal et al
as 2:2007at00671
Defendant: M. Veal, E. Ferrer and G. Camaya
Plaintiff: Maurice Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Veal, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01472
Defendant: M. Veal, E. Ferrer and G. Camaya
Plaintiff: Maurice Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Davis, et al v. AG for CA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-15634
Petitioner - Appellant: MAURICE DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HAWN v. PAVLICK et al
as 2:2007cv00110
Plaintiff: MICHAEL HAWN
Defendant: EDWARD PAVLICK, GEORGE MESAROS, MAURICE DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HAWN v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv00091
Plaintiff: MICHAEL HAWN
Defendant: JEFFREY BEARD, JEFFREY BEARD, WILLIAM STICKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?