Cases 1 - 10 of 26
McCall v. Benipal et al
as 2:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Shannon McCall
Defendant:
Jagmeet Singh Benipal, Amrit Pal Singh and SSD Express, Inc.
Interested Party:
UM/UIM Carrier GEICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
McCall v. Benipal et al
as 2:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth McCall
Defendant:
Jagmeet Benipal, Amrit Singh and SSD Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maxey v. Harris et al (JRG1)
as 2:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Samuel McCall, Jr., Santa Rosa Jr. College, Richard Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
James C Maxey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Reed's Metals, LLC v. Blue Steel Manufacturing, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01164
Defendant:
Ricky Fisher, Samuel Carroll, Joanna Carroll and others
Plaintiff:
Reed's Metals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barbaro v. 42 U.S.C. 654(3) Child Support Divsion et al
as 2:2020cv02177
Defendant:
42 U.S.C. 654(3) Child Support Divsion, Debra Sanders, Sheldon Y. McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Barbaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbaro v. 42 U.S.C. 654(3) Alone, and Apart Child Support Program et al
as 2:2018cv02837
Defendant:
Debra Sanders, Sheldon Y. McCall, 45 C.F.R. 75.2 Contractor Shelby County Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Barbaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. Swann et al
as 2:2018cv02478
Defendant:
R.N. Walton, Ms. Cunningham, A.W. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Alonzo Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. USA
as 2:2018cv00098
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ronnie Lee McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCall et al v. Taylor et al
as 1:2018cv01079
Plaintiff:
Larry G McCall and Nettie R McCall
Defendant:
Lloyd Taylor and Pacific Logistics Corp.
Miscellaneou:
Kathy Blount
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
