Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Keith Hall, et al v. Haworth, Incorporated
as 14-20353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH HALL, PATRICK MCCURDY, RACHEL CHILDRESS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HAWORTH, INCORPORATED
McCurdy et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00486
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. McCurdy and Robert L. McCurdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McClain v. Laster et al
as 3:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
Lionel B. McClain
Defendant:
Molly Laster, Carlos Dupuma, Steve Crotwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell McCurdy v. Seaburns, L.L.P., et al
as 13-41271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL SEABURN MCCURDY
Defendant - Appellee:
SEABURNS, L.L.P., T. D. HAMMONS, Individually and in his official capacity, KARLA D. WOOD and others
Darrell McCurdy v. T.D. Hammons, et al
as 13-11264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL SEABURN MCCURDY
Defendant - Appellee:
T. D. HAMMONS, Individually and in His Official Capacity, KARLA D. WOOD and TEXAS POTTER COUNTY
McCurdy v. Hydradyne L L C
as 5:2013cv02741
Plaintiff:
Matt McCurdy
Defendant:
Hydradyne L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hydradyne, LLC v. McCurdy et al
as 2:2013cv00748
Plaintiff:
Hydradyne LLC
Defendant:
Matt McCurdy and Kerry McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCurdy v. Hammons et al
as 2:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Darrell Seaburn McCurdy
Defendant:
TD Hammons, Karla D Wood and Texas Potter County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell McCurdy v. T. Hammons, et al
as 13-40800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL SEABURN MCCURDY
Defendant - Appellee:
T. D. HAMMONS, Individually and in his official capacity, KARLA D. WOOD, UP MCCARTNEY, Officer and others
McCurdy v. Seaburns et al
as 6:2013cv00363
Plaintiff:
Darrell Seaburn McCurdy
Defendant:
Seaburns LLP, TD Hammons, Karla D Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
