General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 392
Haar v. McDowell
as 1:2024cv01129
Petitioner: Jeremy Martin Haar
Respondent: Nicole McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stutler v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00047
Petitioner: Aric Stutler
Respondent: FCI McDowell and E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ronald Dale Bennett v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2024cv00046
Petitioner: Ronald Dale Bennett
Respondent: Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reuben McDowell v. Superintendent Laurel Highlands SCI, et al
as 23-3269
Plaintiff: REUBEN MCDOWELL
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
Gilberto L. Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv10657
Petitioner: Gilberto L. Gonzalez
Respondent: Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbert L. Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv10564
Petitioner: Gilberto L. Gonzalez
Respondent: Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marcus Aubry v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2023cv02400
Petitioner: Marcus Aubry
Respondent: Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDowell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04101
Petitioner: Willie McDowell
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDowell v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00569
Petitioner: Roderick W. McDowell
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robles v. McDowell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv04405
Petitioner: Lomeli Gomez Robles
Respondent: Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?