Cases 41 - 50 of 206
Mihalic v. McDowell et al
as 3:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Mihalic, Sr.
Defendant:
McDowell, Josh Lumbar, Captain Nick Napp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mihalic v. McDowell et al
as 5:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Mihalic, Sr.
Defendant:
Captain McDowell, Josh Lumbar, Captain Nick Napp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. ChaJuan McDowell
as 22-3077
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHAJUAN ROMEL MCDOWELL
Newman v. Boyle County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Destin Newman
Defendant:
Boyle County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Derek Robbins, Tanner Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Dimorio McDowell
as 21-4146
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DIMORIO MCDOWELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McDowell et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05144
Plaintiff:
Tina McDowell and Conrad McDowell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lloyd v. Cannon et al
as 4:2021cv01476
Plaintiff:
Susan Lloyd
Defendant:
Timothy Cannon, Mary Jane Trapp, Cynthia Westcott Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parshall v. Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00108
Defendant:
Shannon B. Arvin, Kentucky Bancshares, Inc., Woodford Van Meter and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
D.S.S., et al v. Prudential Insurance Company, et al
as 21-5315
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAVEY L. BROWN and D. S. S., By and Through His Next Friend and Custodian, Quintina McDowell f/k/a Quintina Gore
Defendant / Appellee:
TIME WARNER CABLE, INC. and PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
