Cases 1 - 10 of 79
McNulty, Ned v. Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center
as 3:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Ned Charles McNulty, II
Defendant:
Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas McNulty v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-12841
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS JAMES MCNULTY
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Dudley v. Hininger et al
as 5:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dudley
Defendant:
Damon T Hininger, Terrance Dickerson and Holly McNulty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dudley v. Hininger et al
as 4:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dudley
Defendant:
Damon T Hininger, Terrance Dickerson and Holly McNulty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNulty v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
Jayson McNulty
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James McNulty v. Superintendent Waymart SCI, et al
as 22-3023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MCNULTY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
MCNULTY v. WAHL et al
as 2:2022cv03850
Petitioner:
JAMES MCNULTY
Respondent:
MARK WAHL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Fudge v. Bret Bennett, et al
as 22-35723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CHARLES FUDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET BENNETT, NANCY ARMSTRONG, JEREMY BEAUMONT and others
James Fudge v. Bret Bennett, et al
as 22-35708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CHARLES FUDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET BENNETT, NANCY ARMSTRONG, JEREMY BEAUMONT and others
Picozzi v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv01011
Defendant:
Julie Matousek, Danyele Sipes, State of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Picozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
