Cases 1 - 10 of 255
MCWILLIAMS v. MURPHY
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MCWILLIAMS
Defendant:
P MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Mojica v. Jirasek et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Dean Anthony Mojica
Defendant:
Blake Jirasek, Brian Connolly, Dee McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McWilliam v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Donald McWilliam
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McWilliam v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Donald McWilliam
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobb v. McLean et al
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell Cobb
Defendant:
Joseph McLean, Dmitry Chester, Nurse Katie Kropidlowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McWilliams, Maurice v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80055
Plaintiff:
Maurice McWilliams
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKS v. MCWILLIAMS et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JAMAAL BURKS
Defendant:
LASQUBIA MCWILLIAMS, DEBBIE JONES, KELLEY WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Reep et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlson v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Benjmain Carlson
Defendant:
Adrian Ortiz, Alexandria Norville, Andrew Erikson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
