Cases 1 - 10 of 6,303
Eicher Motors Limited v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2024cv02318
Plaintiff:
Eicher Motors Limited
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, ZamiyahYarborough, Yunnapretty and others
Petitioner:
John Price
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
QBE Specialty Insurance Company v. CITY OF MIAMI et al
as 1:2024cv21854
Plaintiff:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI, Joe Carollo, Arthur Noriega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Mendez v. Trans Lines, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael Mendez
Defendant:
Trans Lines, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hernandez et al v. Telecom Business Solution, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03457
Petitioner:
Jorge Hernandez, Alberto Arzu, Alejandro Sagastume and others
Respondent:
Telecom Business Solution, LLC, Latam Towers, LLC and AMLQ Holdings (Cay), Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 205 Removal from State Court: Enforcement of Foreign Arbital Awards
United States of America v. Best (Cox)
as 24-1188
Defendant:
WALLACE BEST, JEFFREY THOMAS, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mendez Company, LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Mendez Company, LLC
Defendant:
Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
