Cases 1 - 10 of 32
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Thomas Samuel Wallace
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Department, Unknown Leuck, Unknown Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cathlin v. The City of New York
as 1:2023cv04219
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Cathlin
Defendant:
The City of New York, Christina Awad, Jacob Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miceli v. USA
as 3:2022cv00553
Petitioner:
Anthony Miceli
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Maricopa County 4th Avenue Jail
as 2:2021cv00197
Plaintiff:
Salathiel Johnson
Defendant:
Maricopa County 4th Avenue Jail and Unknown Miceli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODMAN v. MICELI et al
as 2:2020cv01259
Defendant:
ERIC T. ARMEL, BETH RUDZIEMSKI, D. VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE I. GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hill v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2020cv00603
Defendant:
J Rogers, Unknown Perry, L Tijerina and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Dwayne Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv05504
Defendant:
Unknown Lee, Unknown Alcala, Unknown Spurgin and others
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blunt v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv05418
Defendant:
Lance Leslie, Sandra Ybarra, Tamara Kindell-House and others
Plaintiff:
DeQuint Matthew Blunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv01839
Defendant:
Unknown Lee, Unknown Alcala, Unknown Tennyson and others
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
