Cases 31 - 40 of 3,495
Progressive Max Insurance Company v. Taylor et al
as 2:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Progressive Max Insurance Company
Defendant:
Michael Taylor and Emily Alford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
Director Michael Carvajal, Doe 1, K. Craddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-055.500 et al
as 5:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-055.500, Michael P. Otte and Denise A. Otte
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Pugh v. Coleman et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Ethan Pugh
Defendant:
Michael Sean Coleman, April Riley, Steven Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Harris v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00610
Petitioner:
Anthony Michael Harris
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Warden W. Holzapfel, Dr. Edwards, Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Gottfried v. Pacholke
as 5:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Michael Gottfried
Defendant:
Correctional Officer C. Pacholke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barnett v. Wexford Health
as 3:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
John Michael Barnett
Defendant:
Wexford Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
