Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arista Power, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04598
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arista Power, Inc., Peter Kolokouris, William A. Schmitz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Clarkes et al v. Hughes
as 2:2017cv00961
Plaintiff:
Cassondra Church, Alicia Clarkes, Juanita Clarkes and others
Defendant:
Michael G. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mast et al v. The City of Auburn, Kentucky et al
as 1:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Dan Mast and Emanuel Miller
Defendant:
City of Auburn, Kentucky , Michael A. Hughes and Larry Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Jay Hughes v. Judge Virginia A. Phillips
as 5:2017mc00001
Plaintiff:
Michael Jay Hughes
Defendant:
Virginia A. Phillips
Michael Jay Hughes v. Chris Bates, et al
as 5:2016cv02647
Defendant:
Chris Bates and Michael Cronshey
Plaintiff:
Michael Jay Hughes
Aguilar et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as NYS/1:16-cv-09663
Plaintiff:
Luis Aguilar , James Alamia , Rena Alexander and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Saudi Binladin Group, Mohamed Binladin Company and others
Aguilar et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2016cv09663
Plaintiff:
Luis Aguilar , James Alamia , Rena Alexander and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Saudi Binladin Group, Mohamed Binladin Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hughes v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv01334
Petitioner:
Michael L Hughes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hughes v DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016dp20169
Plaintiff:
Michael L Hughes
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
