Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Haley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Haley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michael Haley, Sr.In re: Michael Haley, Sr.
as 20-1057
Not Yet Classified:
In re: MICHAEL LEON HALEY, SR., SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and others
HALEY v. SCI-FOREST et al
as 5:2019cv05511
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT SCI-FOREST
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LEON HALEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haley v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10713
Plaintiff:
Michael Dwain Haley
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Wolf v. LifePoint Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01397
Plaintiff:
Marcy Wolf
Defendant:
Kermit R. Crawford, William F. Carpenter, III, Reed V. Tuckerson and others
SMITH v. STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. SMITH
Defendant:
STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. , JOHN D. LAPEY , MICHAEL P. HALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re: Michael Haley, Sr.
as 16-3418
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL LEON HALEY, SR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Stevens v. Ply Gem Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05283
Plaintiff:
John Stevens
Defendant:
Ply Gem Holdings, Inc., Gary E. Robinette, Shawn K. Poe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Waterford Township Police & Fire Retirement System v. Ply Gem Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03577
Plaintiff:
Waterford Township Police & Fire Retirement System
Defendant:
Ply Gem Holdings, Inc., Gary E. Robinette, Shawn K. Poe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In re: Michael Haley, Sr.
as 14-2092
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL LEON HALEY, SR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
