Cases 1 - 10 of 1,981
Tenempaguay v. Cajigas et al
as 1:2024cv03395
Plaintiff:
Angel David Moncayo Tenempaguay
Defendant:
Michael Anthony Cajigas, Sauder Transport Company and R.W. Sauder, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
USA v. Michael Clark
as 24-1349
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY CLARK
Kendrick, Michael A. v. John Doe et al
as 2:2024cv14124
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Kendrick
Defendant:
John Doe and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen (ID 79712) v. Facebook et al
as 5:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Allen
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Instagram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ransome Ndi Nfor v. City of Perris et al
as 5:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Ransome Ndi Nfor
Defendant:
City of Perris, County of Riverside, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, A MUNICIPAL ENTITY et al v. City of Perris et al
as 2:2024cv02983
Plaintiff:
Ransome Ndi Nfor
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, A MUNICIPAL ENTITY
Defendant:
City of Perris, Michael Anthony Arreola and State Of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nfor v. County of Riverside et al
as 2:2024cv02985
Plaintiff:
Ransome Ndi Nfor
Defendant:
County of Riverside, City of Perris, Michael Anthony Arreola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
