Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Palange v. Forte, et al
as 21-1481
Defendant / Appellee:
LOIS IANNONE, RONALD PAGLIARINI, RICHARD UPDEGROVE and others
Interested Party:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RI STATE POLICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN J. PALANGE
Palange v. Forte, et al
as 19-1951
Defendant / Appellee:
LOIS IANNONE, RONALD PAGLIARINI, RICHARD UPDEGROVE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN J. PALANGE
Palange v. Forte
as 1:2019cv00340
Plaintiff:
Steven Palange and Steven J. Palange
Defendant:
Michael B. Forte, Courtney E. Hawkins, Jean Maggiacomo and others
Not Classified By Court:
Deputy Clerk Jean Maggiacomo
Respondent:
Rhode Island State Police and Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forte v. Medeiro
as 17-1298
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. FORTE
Respondent - Appellee:
SEAN MEDEIROS, Superintendent
Seguin v. Bedrosian, et al
as 13-1242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY SEQUIN
Defendant - Appellee:
HAIGANUSH R. BEDROSIAN, in her official and individual capacities as Chief Judge of the Family Court of the State of Rhode Island, JOHN E. MCCANN, III, in his official and individual capacities as Associate Judge of the Family Court of the State of Rhode Island, STEPHEN J. CAPINERI, in his official and individual capacities as Associate Judge of the Family Court of the State of Rhode Island and others
Seguin v. Bedrosian et al
as 1:2012cv00614
Plaintiff:
Mary Seguin
Defendant:
Haiganush R. Bedrosian , John E McCann, III , Stephen J Capineri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forte v. Mendonsa
as 12-8021
Petitioner:
MICHAEL B. FORTE
Respondent:
ANTHONY MENDONSA, Superintendent
Forte v. Dickhaut
as 11-2434
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. FORTE
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
Forte v. Dickhaut
as 1:2011cv10862
Petitioner:
Michael B. Forte
Respondent:
Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
