Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Siddha v. Circuit Court for Carroll County Court Reporters' Office et al
as 1:2023cv03525
Plaintiff:
Yimoe Nitya Siddha
Defendant:
Circuit Court for Carroll County Court Reporters' Office, Michael Burns, Lisa Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Stephens et al
as 1:2022cv00877
Plaintiff:
Michael Burns
Defendant:
John Stephens and Hidden Creek Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00017
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Abbott, Leslie Adams, Ricky Adamson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv01719
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company, The, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rush v. Davis-Stuart, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
Anethra Coleman, Anthony Dalmer, Scott Brewer and others
Defendant:
Davis-Stuart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Burns v. USA
as 2:2016cv00578
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Aaron Michael Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00523
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Burns et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02817
Plaintiff:
Debbie Burns and Michael Burns
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11294
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Burns and Michael Burns
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Michael Burn
as 10-4922
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL BURNS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
