Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Council et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council, Kinetik Justice, Lee Edward Moore, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. DIXON et al
as 5:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAMPBELL
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, T BOWDEN, A KEATON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Campbell v. Rick Hill
as 23-55586
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL CAMPBELL
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK HILL, Warden
Campbell et al v. County Of Nassau, State Of N.Y. et al
as 2:2023cv01058
Plaintiff:
Michael Campbell and James Campbell
Defendant:
County Of Nassau, State Of N.Y., Nassau University Medical Center, Narda Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. United States of America
as 22-1937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Campbell
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Abbatiello v. Legrow et al
as 1:2020cv00586
Defendant:
Matthew Keating, Brian Daly, T-Mobile U.S.A Law Enforcement Relations and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Abbatiello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Campbell v. Warden Rick Hill
as 2:2020cv01530
Petitioner:
Michael Campbell
Respondent:
Warden Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Campbell v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 16-16382
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Michael Campbell v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 16-15881
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
