Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Warner v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner, Jr
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Tracy Reveal, Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Itson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
Kardell A. Itson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Steve Mulroy, Michael Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Marshall
as 23-40672
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Calhoun
Defendant / Appellee:
LaMorris Marshall, Chase R. Johnson, Nickie Page and others
Spurlock v. Ruckel et al
as 1:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Joseph Spurlock
Defendant:
Chaplin Ruckel, Michael Davis and Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02601
Plaintiff:
Jamal M. Bey
Defendant:
Chaplain Blaire Smith and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Davis v. Christopher Brun
as 23-5641
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER BRUN, Warden
DAVIS v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2023cv06488
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MICHAEL DAVIS
Respondent:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and WILLIAM POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-14329
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
