Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tso v. Murray, et al
as 19-1352
Defendant / Appellee:
KILLIS RIDINGS & VANAU PC, RICHARD F. SPIEGLE, Individually Psy. D., CYNTHIA COFFMAN, official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT T. TSO
Tso v. Murray, et al
as 19-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD F. SPIEGLE, Individually Psy. D., CYNTHIA COFFMAN, official capacity, COLORADO DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT T. TSO, a natural person and an American
Tso v. Murray et al
as 1:2019cv00293
Defendant:
Rebecca Murray, Ross B.H. Buchanan, Russell Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert T. Tso
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Tso v. Murray, et al
as 19-1021
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD F. SPIEGLE, Individually Psy. D., CYNTHIA COFFMAN, official capacity, COLORADO DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT T. TSO, a natural person and an American
Dixon v. BOKF, N.A.
as 2:2018cv02171
Defendant:
BOKF, N.A. and BOKF, N.A. doing business as Home Direct Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Michael Dixon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Green v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jamalian Green
Defendant:
John Wright Hickenlooper, Jr. , Michael Hartman and Michael Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chubb v. Keck et al
as 5:2017cv03220
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Chubb
Defendant:
Tim Keck, Bill Rein, Michael Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beyer v. DesLauriers et al
as 5:2017cv03002
Plaintiff:
Herbert J. Beyer
Defendant:
Austin DesLauriers, Michael Dixon, Bill Rein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritchie v. DesLauriers et al
as 5:2017cv03003
Plaintiff:
Randall J. Ritchie
Defendant:
Austin DesLauriers, Michael Dixon, Bill Rein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Hatch et al
as 1:2013cv00148
Petitioner:
Michael Dixon
Respondent:
Timothy Hatch and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
