Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Adames v. Martin et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
David Adames
Defendant:
Michael Edward Martin and A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence
WU et al v. KEK TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02892
Not Classified By Court:
YAQUN WU and LAWRENCE WONG
Defendant:
KEK Trucking, INC. and MICHAEL EDWARD DUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv02819
Plaintiff:
YAQUN WU, LAWRENCE WONG and NO PARTY
Defendant:
KEK Trucking, INC. and MICHAEL EDWARD DUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ball v. Blanton et al
as 2:2022cv01396
Plaintiff:
Maikiya Christine Ball
Defendant:
Michael Edward Blanton, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Haas v. Rogers
as 4:2020cv00688
Plaintiff:
Stephen C Haas
Defendant:
Michael Edwards Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwards v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Zachary Ploeger, United States of America and United States Army
Plaintiff:
Michael Edwards
HAMMONDS et al v. GRAY TRANSPORTATION INC et al
as 5:2018cv00346
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE BLACK, BILLY WAYNE NIPPER and MICHAEL EDWARD HAMMONDS
Defendant:
HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC, GRAY TRANSPORTATION INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rice et al v. Edwards et al
as 1:2018cv08174
Defendant:
Michael Edwards and XPO Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Way and Katherine Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv
Scott v. Edwards et al
as 8:2017cv03800
Defendant:
Michael Edwards and EG Systems
Plaintiff:
Rameaun Lamont Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Raine et al
as 2:2016cv00782
Plaintiff:
Summer Clark
Defendant:
Michael Edward Raine and Ruby Ranch LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
