Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Little v. Easley et al
as 5:2009ct03069
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Rydell Little
Defendant:
Michael F. Easley, Roy Cooper, Theodis Beck and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edward Gardner, IV v. Michael Easley
as 09-6256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD J. GARDNER, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. EASLEY, BEVERLY PERDUE, JOHN AND JANE DOES, NC Senators 1-500 and others
Martinez v. Easley
as 5:2009hc02008
Petitioner:
Francisco Martinez
Respondent:
Michael F. Easley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carrington v. Easley et al
as 5:2008ct03175
Plaintiff:
Robert Timothy Carrington
Defendant:
Michael F. Easley, Boyd Bennett and Theodis Beck
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Littrell et al v. Beck et al
as 5:2008ct03121
Plaintiff:
Jackie DeWayne Littrell, Robbie Sherron and Keith Douglas Moran
Defendant:
Theodis Beck, Phillip Griffin, Donald H. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Omar Pearson v. United States of America, et al
as 08-5216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Omar Demetrious Pearson
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, White House Building, James C. Turk, State of North Carolina and others
Arthur Armstrong v. Michael Easley
as 08-1681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. EASLEY, M. D. CONGLETON, CITY OF WENDELL and others
Anderson v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2008ct03046
Plaintiff:
James Christopher Anderson
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Michael F. Easley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ANDERSON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2008cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and MICHAEL F. EASLEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PEARSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00454
Plaintiff:
OMAR DEMETRIOUS PEARSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES C. TURK, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
