Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-35022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Howell v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-73419
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOWELL, AKA Michael Hugh Howell, AKA Mark Teape, AKA Andrew Wilkins
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Howell v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-70784
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOWELL, AKA Michael Hugh Howell, AKA Mark Teape, AKA Andrew Wilkins
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Washington et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00611
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Washington , Isiah Staley , Gregory Beatty and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noonsab v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
as 5:2016ct03112
Plaintiff:
Somchai Noonsab
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, W. T. Brown, Stephen Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stamey et al v. Howell et al
as 9:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Richard Stamey and Valerie Stamey
Defendant:
Michael Howell, Victoria Howell and Bitterroot Star, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Howell v. Borets U.S., Inc.
as 2:2015cv02050
Plaintiff:
James Michael Howell
Defendant:
Borets U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2014cv00608
Plaintiff:
Michael Howell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
