Cases 1 - 10 of 18
MULHERN v. FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD et al
as 2:2019cv00671
Defendant:
RIVINDRA DEO, MICHAEL KENNEDY, RON MCCRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL MULHERN
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8470
BUNTING et al v. NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER et al
as 1:2019cv00026
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER, MICHAEL KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff:
BEVERLYN GRISSOM, CHARLES BUNTING and MICHELLE BUNTING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv16550
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WATSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv04399
Defendant:
MICHAEL KENNEDY, DONALD CAIN, MAUREEN SNYDER and others
Plaintiff:
CARDEL (KHALID) WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
KENNEDY v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06776
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MICHAEL KENNEDY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERCER COUNTY CHILDRENS MEDICAL COURT DAYCARE, LLC et al v. O'DOWD et al
as 3:2013cv01436
Plaintiff:
MERCER COUNTY CHILDRENS MEDICAL COURT DAYCARE, LLC , M.B. , A.R. and others
Defendant:
MARY O'DOWD , NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH , DEBORAH GOTTLIEB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
GIBSON v. SHOPRITE et al
as 1:2012cv04077
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ANTHONY GIBSON, JR.
Defendant:
SHOPRITE, MICHAEL KENNEDY, MARC HUBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNEDY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 2:2011cv06563
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENNEDY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
