Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ross v. Kent County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Terrell Ross
Defendant:
Kent County Sheriff's Department, Grand Rapids, City of, Grand Rapids Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
LELAND v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21433
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LELAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARCUM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08351
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LELAND MARCUM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bartel et al v. Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00537
Plaintiff:
Dustin Bartel , Pamela Ahlberg , Christopher Alba and others
Defendant:
Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc. and General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chunn v. Southeast Logistics, Inc.
as 2:2017cv02848
Plaintiff:
Michael Leland Chunn
Defendant:
Southeast Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodrum/Ambulatory Systems Development LLC et al v. Lakeshore Surgicare LLC et al
as 2:2009mc00081
Plaintiff:
Woodrum/Ambulatory Systems Development LLC and David Woodrum
Defendant:
Lakeshore Surgicare LLC, REASC LLC, Anton Thompkins and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Woodrum/Ambulatory Systems Development, LLC et al v. Lakeshore Surgicare, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv01721
Plaintiff:
Woodrum/Ambulatory Systems Development, LLC, Woodrum/Ambulatory Systems Development, LLC, David Woodrum and others
Defendant:
Lakeshore Surgicare, LLC, REASC, LLC, Anton Thompkins and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
