Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shriver v. City of Westminster et al
as 1:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Clayton Shriver
Defendant:
City of Westminster, Michael Owen and Tyler Farson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Owens v. Hurricane Electronics
as 1:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
Michael Owens
Defendant:
Hurricane Electronics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
OPIPARI v. CITY OF PRINCETON et al
as 3:2016cv00235
Defendant:
CITY OF PRINCETON, CORRECTION OFFICERS NOT YET IDENTIFIED, JOHN DYER and others
Plaintiff:
DAWN OPIPARI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OPIPARI v. CITY OF PRINCETON et al
as 1:2016cv03189
Defendant:
CITY OF PRINCETON, CORRECTION OFFICERS NOT YET IDENTIFIED, JOHN DYER and others
Plaintiff:
DAWN OPIPARI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert A Peete v. Mark S Arnold et al
as 2:2013cv01877
Defendant:
Mark S Arnold, Donald H Blevins, Steve Cooley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A Peete
Abdell v. The City of New York
as 12-4460
Plaintiff:
David Beeny, Richard Csontos, Peter De Mott and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Tarasik Abdell, Joseph Amato, Gary Ashbeck and others
Defendant - Appellant:
The City of New York, Raymond Kelly, Commissioner New York City Police Department, Michael Bloomberg, Mayor City of New York and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
