Cases 1 - 10 of 23
SANFORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26294
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SANFORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANFORD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09194
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SANFORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WAGNER v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07508
Plaintiff:
JAMES WAGNER, JOHNATHAN WAGNER, BOYD A. WALKER, JR. and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wagner et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
James Wagner, Johnathan Wagner, Boyd A. Walker, Jr. and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08421
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Carresi v. City of Newton
as 1:2020cv11538
Plaintiff:
Brian Malo, James White, Stephen Hodgdon and others
Defendant:
City of Newton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SANFORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv18857
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SANFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheheen et al v. Carter et al
as 3:2019cv02577
Defendant:
James S. Carter, Melinda R. Carter and Terri Horton
Plaintiff:
Amanda Sheheen and Michael Sanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOSKINS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03182
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SONNIER, AARON MOSDAL, CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
