Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Bixler v. Norfolk Sourthern Railway Co.
as 1:2023cv01361
Plaintiff:
Michal Bixler
Defendant:
Norfolk Sourthern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
BROWN v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION- ALBION
as 1:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE L. BROWN
Defendant:
STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION- ALBION, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., CORIZON HEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Caccia v. Wapinski et al
as 3:2021cv01447
Plaintiff:
William A. Caccia, II
Defendant:
Warden David Wapinski, D.A. Michale Opake and William Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02501
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MICHALS et al v. MEDINA LOPEZ
as 5:2021cv02337
Plaintiff:
MARIAN MICHALS
Cross Claimant:
CECILIA A. MEDINA LOPEZ
Cross Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MICHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Lycoming County Prison et al
as 1:2021cv00781
Defendant:
Nate Edler, Chase Willard, Lt. Harry Entz and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HUGHES v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00267
Defendant:
JOHN DOE - 2, JOHN DOE - 3, J. BEACH and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, MICHALE KLOPOTOSKI, THOMAS LAVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
