Cases 11 - 20 of 1,366
Gray v. Chrisman et al
as 5:2024cv10857
Plaintiff:
Nijyal Gray
Defendant:
Troy Chrisman, Michigan Department of Corrections, Wayne State University and others
Roseman, Sr. v. Grant et al
as 2:2024cv10830
Plaintiff:
John L. Roseman, Sr.
Defendant:
Nanci J. Grant, Shalina D. Kumar, Nathan Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Michigan, State of v. Matthews
as 2:2024cv10805
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of
Defendant:
Marlon Demon Matthews
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ryan v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2024cv10672
Plaintiff:
Sean Ryan and Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Bureau of Health Care Services, Heidi Washington and others
United States of America v. $7,967.67 from Michigan State University Federal Credit Union Account Ending 8960
as 1:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$7,967.67 from Michigan State University Federal Credit Union Account Ending 8960
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Adams v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv10562
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Adams
Defendant:
United States of America, Michigan, State of, Saginaw, County of and others
Nichols v. Davis
as 2:2024cv10543
Petitioner:
Danny Albert Nichols, Jr
Respondent:
Michigan, State of and John Davis
Hardaway et al v. Grandy II et al
as 2:2024cv10528
Plaintiff:
Carla Hardaway and Nyrand Hardaway
Defendant:
Colonel James F. Grandy II, Trooper John Christiansen, Trooper Unknown Michigan State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
