Cases 21 - 30 of 252
Donald Sturgis v. MDOC, et al
as 19-2296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD STURGIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Denver Goree, Jr. v. Michigan Parole Board
as 19-1817
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENVER MAXWELL GOREE, JR.
Goldman et al v. Winn
as 2:2019cv12011
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board, Depart of Corrections and Thomas Winn
Petitioner:
Lance Adam Goldman
Travis May v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 19-1596
Defendant / Appellee:
POND, Resident Substance Abuse Treatment Counselor, THOMAS COMBS, Michigan Parole Board Member, HERNANDEZ, Resident Substance Abuse Treatment Counselor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS MAY
Maggit #496871 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00411
Defendant:
St. Louis Correctional Facility, Michigan Department of Corrections, Unknown Houghton and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Maggit #496871
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goree v. Michigan Parole Board
as 1:2019cv00395
Plaintiff:
Denver Goree #111992, Jr.
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salami v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2019cv11321
Plaintiff:
Michael Mohammed Salami
Defendant:
Heidi Washington and Michigan Parole Board
Goree v. Michigan Parole Board
as 2:2019cv10869
Plaintiff:
Denver Goree
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board
Anthony Kinard v. Michael Eagan, et al
as 19-1214
Defendant / Appellee:
ABIGAIL CALLEJAS, Parole Board, EDWIN M. HEAP, Ex-Probation Agent Supervisor now Parole Board, MICHAEL E. ULCH, Probation Agent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. KINARD
Umar Muhammad v. Melissa Jennings, et al
as 19-1190
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Identified on initiating document as Sherry Washington, MELISSA K. JENNINGS, Michigan Parole Board, MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, Named as Parole Board et al - Members and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UMAR MUHAMMAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
