Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Counts v. Wasko et al
as 4:2023cv04103
Defendant:
GTL Technology, Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke and others
Plaintiff:
David L Counts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Siers v. Young et al
as 4:2014cv04087
Plaintiff:
Donovan Craig Siers
Defendant:
Darin Young, Robert Dooley, Patrick MaGorian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Davenport, et al
as 13-3396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Davenport, SIS, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Frederick Banks v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 13-2995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks, an American Indian
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Frederick Banks v. Davenport, et al
as 13-2980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Davenport, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Banks v. Davenport et al
as 4:2013cv00481
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Davenport, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Samuels et al
as 4:2013cv00482
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Davenport et al
as 4:2013cv00480
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Davenport, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. W. Roberts, et al
as 13-2828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
W. Roberts, Correctional Officer, FCI - Forrest City, Truck, Correctional Officer, FCI - Forrest City, Vlad, Correctional Officer, FCI - Forrest City and others
Banks v. Haynes et al
as 2:2013cv00082
Defendant:
United States Congress, Malissa Jackson, United States Senate and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
