Cases 41 - 50 of 851
Bonds v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05720
Plaintiff:
Zakery Michael Bonds
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Widland v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05719
Plaintiff:
Brian Douglas Widland, Jr
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stacy v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05718
Plaintiff:
Scott Ryan Stacy
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Langley v. Miller et al
as 4:2023cv05112
Plaintiff:
Donna Langley
Defendant:
Don Miller and James Kiddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bridgewater v. Schmitz et al
as 2:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
Keywanie S Bridgewater
Defendant:
Zach Schmitz, Michael Jason Jayson and James L Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lotusflower v. Headley et al
as 3:2023cv05558
Plaintiff:
Nonnie Marcella Lotusflower
Defendant:
Charlotte Headley, Alishia McColl, Boschulte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller-Hotchkiss v. Safeway Inc
as 2:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
Margaret Miller-Hotchkiss
Defendant:
Safeway Inc. and Safeway Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Renfrow-Harris v. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv00172
Defendant:
Steven Burke Fall, Michelle Castendra, Joshua Clinton Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Joslyn Marie Renfrow-Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
